But this article makes some valid points that resonate with my concerns about taking call as an ophthalmologist: namely the local monopolistic hospital has decided that only some specialities deserve to be paid for taking emergency call, and ophthalmology is not among them. Second, in this litiginous society, taking call is a huge risk for any doctor...
Modern maladies. So where have all the specialists gone? They've been driven away, observers say, by three modern maladies of American healthcare: too much work, too little pay, and the fear of malpractice lawsuits. "Put all those things together, and who would want to be in this business?" asks Todd Taylor, who teaches emergency medicine at Vanderbilt University in Tennessee.
And it doesn't pay. The federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act, enacted in 1986 to prevent discrimination against the poor, requires that emergency departments screen all patients and ensure they are not in an immediate medical crisis, regardless of their ability to pay. That means hospitals need to maintain a roster of on-call specialists. But the law has also pushed hospitals to pressure doctors to provide on-call services for nothing in return for hospital affiliation. Doctors used to agree to this deal because they needed hospitals as places to perform surgery, and the workload wasn't too heavy. But as the workload spiraled up, surgeons spent more time answering ER calls and less time dealing with their own practices and paying patients. If they were affiliated with more than one hospital, as many doctors are, both hospitals made demands.
Recently, "office-based surgery and free-standing surgical clinics have given orthopedists and plastic surgeons and others a way out," says Rick Cameron, project manager of the Emergency Department Management Group in Palm Beach County, Fla., a partnership of county hospitals trying to solve the specialist shortage that has dogged that region. "Many don't need to be affiliated with hospitals to do their jobs."
Finally, there's fear of being sued. On-call surgeons worry there's more chance of getting sued by a stranger whom they rush to treat in an ER than by an established patient having elective surgery. "Anything can happen in an ER," says Jose Arrascue, a kidney specialist in Boynton Beach, Fla."If you have no rapport with the family, they may conclude you did something wrong, and you are wide open for a suit. That really concerns me." There have been calls for legislation exempting doctors on ER duty from lawsuits, but the idea of immunity from malpractice hasn't appealed to federal or state lawmakers.
To minimize risk, many doctors stop taking ER calls. Or, Valadka says, surgeons may limit the types of operations they do in regular practice, which means they won't be called in for emergencies that are beyond those limits. For example, some neurosurgeons—ironically—have stopped doing brain surgery and focus only on the spine.
3 comments:
Perhaps the most preaching to the choir I have read on this blog.
Ridding ourselves of third party interference like EMTALA, HIPPA, CMS would allow a true free market solution.
Suddenly I think the choir has left the room.
Agree in principle, but I am still a little fuzzy on freemarket solutions that would not result in decreased compensation to doctors...
While I generally espouse free market principles in most situations, I don't think the free market can resolve this issue. Third party interference needs to be put in check. It's ludicrous to not compensate specialists for call. It's not like "hospital privileged" means that the hospital is giving specialists and their patients access to their hospital for free. In fact, the hospital has a liability interest in retaining a sufficient number of specialists to handle the emergencies hospitals are legally mandated to handle (or else face dumping liability).
Unfortunately, the vehicle to rational solutions often tends to depend on which interest group has the most effective and well-connected lobbyists... While I know nothing about the strength of the lobbyists who represent retina surgeons, perhaps they need to be better energized to try to remedy this situation. Or, perhaps what would be more likely to succeed, would be the team effort of the lobbyists of multiple specialists....
Post a Comment